So the Senate decided to have hearings on the issue of rape in the military, which is epidemic in no small part because of massive failures in military leadership to deal with the problem effectively. Because of this, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York has started to push for legislation, which has been effective in other countries, removing rape prosecution from the chain of command and having a more straightforward criminal justice approach. Her reasoning is clear enough, which is that a lot of commanders tend to treat rape like it’s just another form of sexual harassment, which is to say more like an H.R. issue and less like a criminal matter. She is very, very clear about this.
Straightforward, commonsensical. Which is why the conservative reaction ranged from incoherent to bizarre to shockingly misogynist. They hate being accused of waging a war on women, but they are no more going to stop doing so than they’re going to stop over the top pandering displays of patriotism. It’s just who conservatives are. Even though in this particular case, male-on-male rape seems to be as serious a problem as male-on-female rape, which means that calling this a women’s issue is even more asinine and offensive than usual. Not that this prevented Sen. Saxby Chambliss from saying that rape is just what happens when you expose young men to actual women.
Needless to say, there’s no evidence that rape is a result of hormone levels or extreme sexual desire at all. As ever, rape is a crime of violence that is usually motivated much more by the rapist’s desire to dominate the victim than any sexual urge. In fact, the military specifically has a problem with men raping men, and most of those rapists who rape men are straight-identified men. It’s not an expression of sexual desire at all, but an attempt to put someone in his or her place.
(via randomactsofchaos)
National Abortion Federation (via actualfactsaboutabortion)
Also know that the extreme majority of CPCs are not medically licensed.
(via stfuprolifers)
(via qrookedqueer)
In a video statement yesterday, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, AZ said he would appeal a major federal court ruling from last week that ordered an end to practices of racial profiling. The decision from Judge Murray Snow of U.S. District Court in Phoenix, was a major blow to the Sheriff who has made a career as an anti-immigrant force who admits to targeting Latinos during neighborhood sweeps and traffic stops.
“We will appeal this ruling,” Arpaio said yesterday.
In the meantime, Arpaio said that he ordered his deputies to stop detaining undocumented immigrants solely because of their immigration status. “[T]he court’s order is clear,” he said. “We will no longer detain persons believed to be in the country without authorization whom we cannot arrest on state charges.”
But the impact of the ruling in the Melendres v. Arpaio case is not yet clear. Though the court issued an immediate injunction against unconstitutional practices of racial profiling, Arpaio’s statement suggests he may continue to target immigrants under the pretense that they’ve broken state laws. Arpaio’s 800 deputies regularly stop and arrest Latinos in Maricopa County by citing state laws written to target immigrants, including one anti-human smuggling law that makes it possible for the county to charge individuals with smuggling themselves into the country.
This shiftiness leads many to wonder about the impact of the injunction. “We’re going to have to wait and see what happens,” says Carlos Garcia, an organizer with Puente Arizona. “For people to be able to go to work without fearing that they are not going to be stopped or raided would something amazing.”
In his statement, Arpaio also shifted blame for his department’s profiling practices to the federal government.
“One hundred of my deputies were authorized and trained by the federal government, ICE, to enforce federal immigration law,” he said. “Now, a federal court has ruled that federal training was unconstitutional, and it led to racial profiling.”
Maricopa County deputies were indeed trained by federal officials to act as immigration enforcers through the 287(g) programs and were instructed they could use race as a factor in making stops, according to the decision from Judge Snow. But while the federal government helped empower Arpaio’s worst practices, when the 287(g) terminated the agreement, Arpaio continued to detain immigrants and changed his justification saying that he had inherent authority to enforce immigration laws.
Garcia and other advocates are also concerned about the thousands of people who Arpaio has already arrested.
“Who knows how many people have been illegally detained and arrested who’ve ended up with criminal convictions or removed,” said Cecillia Wang, an attorney with the ACLU, which brought suit. “Our case really was looking for injunctive relief to bring an end to the policy and practice of targeting Latinos and detaining people because of immigration status. But this decision does not have any direct impact for people already facing changes.”
Litigants will head to court again on June 14th when Judge Snow will outline next steps to remedy the illegal profiling practices. These could include the introduction of an independent monitor and data collection requirements.
(via randomactsofchaos)
Florida’s governor just signed a bill BANNING paid sick leave.
You know, for as much as conservatives like to bible thump….
I’m pretty sure the Bible says a lot about helping the sick. Wasn’t that one of Jesus’s big points?
There’s one more reason I’m never moving to Florida.
(Source: thehill.com, via randomactsofchaos)
BRB….selling my Microsoft stock…
Can we just take a moment to appreciate how sassy Sony is being? I mean, damn.
There are a lot of people who seem to think that spending time on the internet will wreck a person’s vocabulary
But au contraire
the internet has taught me an assortment of new words to use that have completely replaced really disgusting words in my vocabulary
So I mean
Self absorbed adults can continue to vilify the internet while calling it the r-slur while I sit here and muse on what pestilent children they are.
(via moniquill)
“We live in a profit economy and there is no profit in the prevention of cancer; there is only profit in the treatment of cancer.”
-Audre Lorde, The Cancer Journals, p 71.(quoted in Lisa Diedrich, Treatments, p 60.)
(via queerandpresentdanger)
I just saw a post about pizza that tumblruser pizza hadn’t found yet. Weird.
What can you do when you need an abortion, but you’re a minor in a state where you need parental permission you probably can’t get and you don’t have money? Here are some initial steps.
FaithS asks:
I am 16 years old and already have a 7 month old baby. My son has a…